All of the participants were told that Barbara’s personality was pretty neutral most of the time her behavior towards her colleagues was inoffensive, but occasionally she was especially nice (e.g., holding the door, giving compliments) while other times she was kind of a jerk (e.g., cutting in line, spreading gossip). A group of 201 participants took part in an online study in which they read a scenario about an average office worker named Barbara. In one experiment, Klein and O’Brien attempted to measure the moral tipping point – the number of behaviors that will change our assessment of someone. In other words, “it is apparently easier to become a sinner than a saint, despite exhibiting equivalent evidence for change.” But how many positive or negative acts must a person undertake before we change our minds about someone?Īcross five experiments, Klein and O’Brien found that this moral tipping point is asymmetric - a moral improvement takes a lot more work for us to notice compared to a moral decline, even if the evidence is we observe is the same in each case. A person might donate just a few dollars to charity or cheat on just one exam question,” explain University of Chicago psychological scientists Nadav Klein and Ed O’Brien. “Moral and immoral behaviors often come in small doses. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological ScienceĪ new study demonstrates that shaking a negative first impression is often diabolically difficult, providing just one more reason to make sure that you show up on time for your next job interview.Psychological Science in the Public Interest.Current Directions in Psychological Science.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |